• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM; DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM; DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-AXIUM
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Encephalopathy (1833); Loss of Vision (2139); Cerebral Edema (4403)
Event Date 02/11/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Spiriev t, laleva l, alioski n, et al.Contrast-induced neurotoxicity presented as transient cortical blindness after stent-assisted coiling of a medium-sized unruptured basilar artery aneurysm: a case report and review of the literature.Surgical neurology international.2022;13:48.Doi:10.25259/sni_1143_2021 medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with a solitaire ab and axium coil.The purpose of this article was to present a case of reversible complete cortical blindness after uneventful stent-assisted coiling of a medium-sized unruptured basilar artery aneurysm.The article does not state any technical issues during use of the solitaire ab or axium devices.The following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted:  - on awakening of anesthesia, the patient reported complete visual loss.Ophthalmological examination was normal.The patient was brought back to the angio-suite but there were no signs of parent vessel compromise from the endovascular implants or distal vessel occlusion.An mri of the brain was done showing no signs of brain ischemia, just mild brain edema in both occipital lobes.Given the results of the radiological studies and clinical presentation, the patient was diagnosed with contrast-induced encephalopathy.The patient continued to receive dual antiplatelet therapy as well as anticoagulation treatment with 9500 anti-xa iu/ml 0.6 ml nadroparine calcium b.I.D.; intravenous saline hydration and anti-edematous treatment ¿ dexamethasone in tapering dosage, were administered.In 72 hours, the patient had complete resolution of the visual loss and was discharged home with no additional neurological worsening.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Spiriev t, laleva l, alioski n, et al.Contrast-induced neurotoxicity presented as transient cortical blindness after stent-assisted coiling of a medium-sized unruptured basilar artery aneurysm: a case report and review of the literature.Surgical neurology international.2022;13:48.Doi:10.25259/sni_1143_2021 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported there were no adverse effects associated with any of the medtronic devices.The case report concerns side effects of the contrast media used and it is a known side effect, although very rare.Therefore, the products are of excellent quality and there were no problems associated with their use.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM
Type of Device
DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key15890622
MDR Text Key304589915
Report Number2029214-2022-02023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBU
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-AXIUM
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-AXIUM
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/23/2022
Initial Date FDA Received11/30/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/15/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-