BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 441916 |
Device Problem
False Negative Result (1225)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/21/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.Pma/510k info: k111860, k130470.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument false negatives occurred.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: for a problem with a sample on the bd max that was given as negative and they did the immunochromatographic analysis and it gave a slight positive clostridium kit.Hazard, injury or erroneous results? no.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument false negatives occurred.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: for a problem with a sample on the bd max that was given as negative and they did the immunochromatographic analysis and it gave a slight positive clostridium kit.Hazard, injury or erroneous results? no.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H.6 investigation summary: the complaint alleges the bd max instrument (catalog number 441916 and serial number (b)(6)) had a "false negative".Customer reported that they received a suspected false negative result for a patient specimen while running the c.Diff assay.Customer states they performed a confirmatory immunochromatographic analysis of the sample which indicated a positive result.The customer database was provided to bd service specialists for further analysis which revealed that the instrument is functioning to specifications and possible evidence of issues with the specific sample tested.This complaint is not confirmed as no problem was found with the instrument and it alludes to an issue with the specimen.Root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.No samples were expected to be received as part of this complaint, and therefore no samples were returned, and no returned material investigation could occur.Review of device history record for instrument ct1989 is not required because this complaint does not allege a functional issue with the instrument and the complaint is unconfirmed, thus a dhr review would yield no useful information.Service history review was performed for the instrument ct1989, and no additional work orders were observed for the complaint failure mode reported.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor for trends associated with this complaint.No new risks or hazards, or changes to existing risks/hazards, were identified as a result of this complaint.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|