The spacer was returned and the analysis of the field imaging (x-ray) revealed that the implant dislodged while still in between l3-4 lumbar vertebrae.The dislodgement of the implant is a known risk of the device.However, the analysis confirmed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body and deformed.The actuator of the implant exhibited severed abrasion on the mating surface and a severe scrape on the side of the actuator.Therefore, functional testing could not be performed.The damage to the implant suggested that excessive force was used during the implantation of the device.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label, which states that migration or dislodgement of the implant from the original position, so that it becomes ineffective or causes damage to adjacent bone or soft tissues, including nerves, and loosening, fatigue, deformation, breakage or disassembly of the implant, which may require another operation to remove the implant, and may require another method of treatment are known risks associated with the use of lumbar spine implants and associated instruments.The ifu also states not to force deployment or implant breakage or damage to bony structures, avoid application of excessive stress on instrumentation, and should any resistance be encountered during deployment of the implant, it may be suggestive of interference between the implant and bony anatomy (e.G., lamina, hypertrophic spinous process), and/or suboptimal implant positioning.Additionally, if resistance is encountered, or if device position is suboptimal, completely reverse-deploy or close the implant before repositioning and redeployment.
|