• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR) QUARTET; PERMANENT PACEMAKER ELECTRODE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR) QUARTET; PERMANENT PACEMAKER ELECTRODE Back to Search Results
Model Number 1458Q/86
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Connection Problem (2900); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/05/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Related manufacturer reference number: 2017865-2022-47964 it was reported that the patient presented for an implant procedure.During the procedure, it was noted that the wrench was unable to tighten the set screw and left ventricle (lv) lead in the pacemaker header.Upon attempting to remove the lv lead from the header, the lead connector pin was broken in the pacemaker header.The pacemaker and lv lead was not used.The physician continued with the second pacemaker and lv lead and completed the procedure.The patient was in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: the correct analysis conclusion should have been "the reported events were ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ and failure to removed lead from the header.A complete lead was returned in two pieces.Dimensional analysis found the diameters of the connector pin, connector ring electrodes, and the connector seal zones found to be within specification.The reported event of ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ was confirmed.Visual inspection of the lead found that the connector pin and connector cap were pulled out of the connector assembly along with the inner coil which is consistent with procedural damage.The cause of the reported event of ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ was due to excessive forces resulted in the connector pin and cap to be pulled out of the connector assembly consistent with procedural damage.A device history record (dhr) review was performed, and all required manufacturing processes and inspection steps were confirmed to be completed per the requirements.The device met specifications prior to leaving abbott manufacturing facilities.", rather than "the reported events were ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ and failure to removed lead from the header.A partial lead was returned in one piece.Dimensional analysis found the diameters of the connector ring electrodes and the connector seal zones were within specification.The connector pin could not be measures due to connector pin not returned with the lead which is consistent with procedural damage.The reported event of ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ was confirmed.Visual inspection of the lead found that the connector pin and connector cap were pulled out of the connector assembly along with the inner coil which is consistent with procedural damage.The cause of the reported event of ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ was due to excessive forces resulted in the connector pin and cap to be pulled out of the connector assembly consistent with procedural damage.A device history record (dhr) review was performed, and all required manufacturing processes and inspection steps were confirmed to be completed per the requirements.The device met specifications prior to leaving abbott manufacturing facilities.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported events were ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ and failure to removed lead from the header.A partial lead was returned in one piece.Dimensional analysis found the diameters of the connector ring electrodes and the connector seal zones were within specification.The connector pin could not be measures due to connector pin not returned with the lead which is consistent with procedural damage.The reported event of ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ was confirmed.Visual inspection of the lead found that the connector pin and connector cap were pulled out of the connector assembly along with the inner coil which is consistent with procedural damage.The cause of the reported event of ¿connector pin broke off in the header¿ was due to excessive forces resulted in the connector pin and cap to be pulled out of the connector assembly consistent with procedural damage.A device history record (dhr) review was performed, and all required manufacturing processes and inspection steps were confirmed to be completed per the requirements.The device met specifications prior to leaving abbott manufacturing facilities.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
QUARTET
Type of Device
PERMANENT PACEMAKER ELECTRODE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR)
15900 valley view court
sylmar CA 91342
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR)
15900 valley view court
sylmar CA 91342
Manufacturer Contact
richard williamson
15900 valley view court
sylmar, CA 91342
MDR Report Key15929774
MDR Text Key306994699
Report Number2017865-2022-47966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier05414734503198
UDI-Public05414734503198
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030054
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1458Q/86
Device Catalogue Number1458Q-86
Device Lot NumberA000128047
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/05/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/07/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
01/26/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/15/2023
01/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-