• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: 3M HEALTH CARE 3M¿ UNIVERSAL ELECTROSURGICAL PAD; ELECTROSURGICAL RETURN ELECTRODE, SINGLE-USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

3M HEALTH CARE 3M¿ UNIVERSAL ELECTROSURGICAL PAD; ELECTROSURGICAL RETURN ELECTRODE, SINGLE-USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 9135-LP
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 11/02/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product sample was not returned to 3m for analysis.Without a sample available, it is not possible to evaluate the sample for any defects or perform any tests to determine if the patient plate met specification.3m cannot determine the exact root cause of the alleged injury or whether an electrode was the root cause.A review of complaint trending for this device was completed and no adverse trends were observed.3m will continue to monitor.To reduce the risk of burns, all instructions should be followed as per the instructions for use (ifu).The instructions for use states, to reduce the risk of burns the site must be clean, dry and free of hair and to remove hair at application site.3m¿ will continue to monitor.
 
Event Description
A hospital reported a 64-year-old female allegedly experienced burns with the use of 3m¿ universal electrosurgical pad, 9135-lp.Post operative joint replacement surgery, the first return electrode was reportedly charred/burnt and the patient allegedly experienced 4th degree burns.Medical intervention was reportedly required, type and date are unknown as well as the patient's current status.On 18-nov-2022, the following information was provided to 3m: a standard type of electrode was used in this case.The resistance reportedly became high, and thus could not be energized.Scorching was observed on the opposite of the return sample from the cord.It was noted that the cord was pulled, the return electrode peeled off, therefore, was in contact with the scorched area.It was assessed that there was no problem with the product.The gel of the returned sample was uniform, and electricity could be supplied at first.Conmed's electrosurgical unit can be used as a split type, therefore, this case may not have occurred if a split type had been used.This case was reportedly due to user error, although the relationship between the burn and the 3m¿ universal electrosurgical pads 9135-lp cannot be excluded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3M¿ UNIVERSAL ELECTROSURGICAL PAD
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL RETURN ELECTRODE, SINGLE-USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
3M HEALTH CARE
2510 conway ave
st. paul MN 55144
Manufacturer (Section G)
3M COMPANY VALLEY PLANT
600 meigs st.
valley NE 68064
Manufacturer Contact
nadia battah
3m center, building 275-5w-06
2510 conway ave
st. paul, MN 55144-1000
6514612670
MDR Report Key15958051
MDR Text Key305239809
Report Number2110898-2022-00123
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier50707387580730
UDI-Public50707387580730
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K974279
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9135-LP
Device Catalogue Number9135-LP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/14/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-