Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Additional information received indicates that the device is not available for return, therefore no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device number lot 30892136l and no internal action related to the complaint was found during the review.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster, inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster, inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure with a thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter and suffered an electrogram st segment elevation which required coronary angiography inspection.St increased during conducting cti ablation.Ablation was interrupted.The symptoms returned to normal spontaneously after approximately 10 minutes.When coronary angiography inspection was performed, no abnormal sites were identified.There was no problem with the patient and the patient left the room.The physician's opinions on the relationship between the event and the product was that because of the anatomical proximity to the rca, transient stenosis is suspected.There is no relationship with the product.There were no abnormalities observed prior to and during use of the product.No relevant medical history.No relevant tests/laboratory data.Additional information was received.The adverse event was discovered during ablation.Physician¿s opinion on the cause of this adverse event was that there is no relationship with the ablation system.The event resolved shortly after coronary angiography inspection was performed.The patient's course was normal.Extended hospitalization was not required.The monitoring at the hospital ward on the day of procedure was also as usual.
|