• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Degraded (1153); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Gradient Increase (1270); Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446)
Event Date 10/31/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Edwards received notification that an inspiris resilia valve model 11500a25 implanted in the aortic position was explanted after an implant duration of two (2) years and five (5) months due to calcific degeneration causing reduced motions of the three leaflets, severe stenosis (mean gradient of 84mmhg) and moderate aortic regurgitation.The patient presented in icu in nhya class iii, chest pain and dyspnea at minimal exertion for the last fifteen days.Tte showed a preserved lvef (55-60%) and a slightly dilated lv.No vegetation.No evidence of thrombosis.Good right ventricular function.Soon after admission for valve replacement, a cardiac arrest due to cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema occurred and the patient was put on ecmo.Due to persistence of ventricular fibrillation despite external electrical shocks and in front of this major cardiogenic shock it was decided to proceed urgently to valve replacement.A mechanical valve was implanted in replacement.The patient died on pod # 2.As reported, there was no allegation of device malfunction and it was considered that the illness (renal disfunction, dialysis and atheromatous disease were the cause of the early svd.).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that an inspiris resilia valve model 11500a25 implanted in the aortic position was explanted after an implant duration of two (2) years and five (5) months due to calcific degeneration causing reduced motions of the three leaflets, severe stenosis (mean gradient of 84mmhg) and moderate aortic regurgitation.Per product evaluation findings, moderate host tissue overgrowth was also observed.The patient presented in icu in nhya class iii, chest pain and dyspnea at minimal exertion for the last fifteen days.Tte showed a preserved lvef (55-60%) and a slightly dilated lv.No vegetation.No evidence of thrombosis.Good right ventricular function.Soon after admission for valve replacement, a cardiac arrest due to cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema occurred and the patient was put on ecmo.Due to persistence of ventricular fibrillation despite external electrical shocks and in front of this major cardiogenic shock it was decided to proceed urgently to valve replacement.A mechanical valve was implanted in replacement.The patient died on pod # 2.As reported, there was no allegation of device malfunction and it was considered that the illness (renal disfunction, dialysis, and atheromatous disease) were the cause of the early svd.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for evaluation.Customer reports of calcific degeneration, reduced leaflet motion, and stenosis were confirmed.Report of regurgitation could not be confirmed through visual observations.The x ray demonstrated the metal band was deformed outward around commissure 3, the vfit cocr alloy band was not expanded.X-ray also demonstrated heavy calcification on all three leaflets.Extrinsic calcific deposits were observed on the outflow surfaces of all three leaflets and inflow surfaces of leaflet 1.Moderate host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 6mm on leaflet1 at the inflow aspect.Minimal host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 4mm on leaflet 1 at the outflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth fused leaflets 1 and 2 by approximately 4mm at commissure 2 on the outflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth on the stent circumference was moderate at the outflow aspect.Calcification and host tissue overgrowth restricted leaflet mobility and led to stenosis.Sewing ring was cut off and exposed the metal band around the valve on the inflow aspect.Wireform was also exposed on commissure 2.Engineering evaluation will be completed to consider any potential factors that may have contributed to this complaint and a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: added information to section d4 (expiration date) and h4 (device manufacturer date).The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10 manufacturer narrative: updated: h6 (device code(s), type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Calcific degeneration is a common cause of bioprosthetic heart valve failures.Many factors contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification.These include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.), mechanical stress related to the valve's hemodynamic performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Of these, the fixation process is a relatively minor contributor to calcification for edwards' tissue valves due to anti-calcification treatments during manufacturing.Though numerous studies have been conducted on preventive calcification strategies in bioprosthetic heart valves, the causes of calcification are not fully understood and there are still no mechanisms or medical therapies which fully prevent bioprostheses from calcifying.Calcification is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction.Pannus overgrowth, or host tissue, is considered to be a form of non-structural valve dysfunction.The growth of host tissue on the sewing ring is expected and is a natural part of the healing reaction to prosthesis implantation.Pannus can have both beneficial and harmful effects depending on the amount of growth.A small amount of host tissue growth over the suture line is needed to form a non-thrombogenic surface and complete the healing process after valve implantation.In contrast, if there is an excessive amount of pannus growth, it can extend onto the cusp surfaces leading to thickening of the cusps, leaflet immobility, elevated gradients, and stenosis.Host tissue growth can also contribute to cusp retraction or curling resulting in valvular regurgitation.Host fibrous (pannus) tissue growth is not a malfunction of the device.The most likely cause is patient factors, including renal disfunction, dialysis and atheromatous disease.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2 office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key16001472
MDR Text Key305683231
Report Number2015691-2022-10091
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/30/2021
Device Model Number11500A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/18/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight80 KG
-
-