Model Number 101-9814 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/02/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a indirect decompression system implant procedure, it was noticed that the top of the device was broken during the sagittal arch maneuver.It was noted that the physician was using moderate force, and assessed that soft tissue seemed to be cause of resistance.The physician was able to remove the piece of the spindle cap that broke off from the patients body and continued with a successful implant.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction to initial mdr box a1 patient initials.Laboratory analysis of the returned device revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body and was deformed.The damage to the implant was sufficient to prevent functional testing.Engineers conclude that the damage to the implant is a result of possible deployment against resistance during the implant procedure.The probable cause is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a indirect decompression system implant procedure, it was noticed that the top of the device was broken during the sagittal arch maneuver.It was noted that the physician was using moderate force, and assessed that soft tissue seemed to be cause of resistance.The physician was able to remove the piece of the spindle cap that broke off from the patients body, and continue with a successful implant.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|