BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 45007 |
Device Problem
Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/08/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the infusion line ruptured.The jetstream xc atherectomy 2.1mm catheter was selected for treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusion.The physician noted difficulty passing the catheter through the cook flexor sheath.The catheter was operated for two passes, however, when they switched to blades up mode, they observed two large fragments of plastic wrapped around the jetstream catheter.The infusion line had ruptured.The jetstream was stopped due to risk of plastic entering the patient, and the procedure continued using balloon catheters and stents.The finished outcome was successful.No reported patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the infusion line ruptured.The jetstream xc atherectomy 2.1mm catheter was selected for treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusion.The physician noted difficulty passing the catheter through the cook flexor sheath.The catheter was operated for two passes, however, when they switched to blades up mode, they observed two large fragments of plastic wrapped around the jetstream catheter.The infusion line had ruptured.The jetstream was stopped due to risk of plastic entering the patient, and the procedure continued using balloon catheters and stents.The finished outcome was successful.No reported patient complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device eval by manufacturer: the device returned to boston scientific consisted of a jetstream xc-2.1 atherectomy catheter.Visual and microscopic examination showed a kink on the catheter shaft located 53cm from the tip.The catheter shaft also showed multiple bends.Further examination revealed a burst infusion sheath on the catheter shaft located 68cm to 70cm from the tip.The device was inserted into the console and set up per the instructions for use (ifu).The device ran as designed; however, the device leaked fluid during functional testing at the burst infusion sheath location.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.Device analysis confirmed the allegation of material separation reported from the field.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|