• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. DISPOSABLE DISTAL ATTACHMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. DISPOSABLE DISTAL ATTACHMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number D-201-11804
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001)
Event Date 02/02/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Name of the user facility: the cancer institute hospital of japanese foundation for cancer research.The lot number of the device was not provided in the article; therefore, it is unknown if the device has already been returned to olympus for evaluation or not.Olympus will be contacting the author of the literature to obtain more information regarding the reported events.The cause of the patients¿ outcome cannot be conclusively determined at this time.If new and relevant information is obtained later, this report will be supplemented accordingly.
 
Event Description
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) received a literature titled "efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions".Literature summary: this study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (pcm) with a traction device (td) with that of conventional esd for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions in 72 patients.The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and r0 resection rates.En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with pcm with td but failed in 22% of cases of conventional esd.The r0 resection rates for pcm with td and conventional esd were 97% and 66%, respectively.Dissection was significantly faster in the pcm with td group (13.0 vs.7.9 mm2/min).This study concludes that the pcm with td is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.Type of adverse events/number of patients: [control group], perforation-1 patient, post-procedural bleeding- 1 patient, [pcm with td group], perforation-1 patient, post-procedural bleeding- 1 patient.Since the literature described "pcf-q260j", we selected "pcf-q260ji" as a representative product.The product was unknown, but a representative product was chosen for processing purposes.Since the literature described "pcf-h290t", we selected "pcf-h290ti" as a representative product.The product was unknown, but a representative product was chosen for processing purposes.The following are the related complaints.This is 1 of 8reports.1.(b)(6) (d-201-11804), 2.(b)(6) (single use electrosurgical knife), 3.(b)(6) (fd-411qr), 4.(b)(6) (hx-610-090s), 5.(b)(6) (gif-q260j), 6.(b)(6) (gif-h290t), 7.(b)(6) (pcf-q260ji), 8.(b)(6) (pcf-h290ti).The literature stated that in terms of adverse events, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to perforation or postoperative bleeding rates.Both cases of perforation were minor that occurred during esd.In both cases, the perforation sites were completely closed with endo-clips.The cases were conservatively managed with antibiotics, and none of the patients required emergency surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.This supplemental report includes a correction to d8 and g2.Information added to these fields that was inadvertently not included on the initial medwatch.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information from the authoring physician who stated that the reported adverse event reported in the literature is not caused by any of the olympus devices, as there was no reported device malfunction.In addition, based on the clinical/medical evaluation and risk assessment, it is presumed that the reported event is an accident, or a complication associated with a surgical procedure using the subject device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISPOSABLE DISTAL ATTACHMENT
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE DISTAL ATTACHMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16031152
MDR Text Key305980515
Report Number9614641-2022-00832
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K984358
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD-201-11804
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FD-411QR- HEMOSTATIC FORCEPS, LOT NUMBER UNKNOWN; GIF-H290T, SERIAL NUMBER UNKNOWN; GIF-Q260J, SERIAL NUMBER UNKNOWN; HX-610-090S, LOT NUMBER IS UNKNOWN; KD-650Q-DUAL KNIFE, LOT NUMBER UNKNOWN; KD-655Q- DUAL KNIFE, LOT NUMBER UNKNOWN; PCF-H290T, SERIAL NUMBER UNKNOWN; PCF-Q260J, SERIAL NUMBER UNKNOWN; VIO 300D- ERBE ELECTROCAUTERY DEVICE
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-