It was reported that, after a primary tka surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2009, the patient sustained swelling, feeling of wrongness and the loosening of the tibial base plate.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2022 to treat this adverse event.During this procedure, the tibial base plate and the articular insert were explanted and replaced with another smith and nephew construct.The outcome of the patient is unknown.
|
Section h3, h6: the devices were not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, it was reported the patient had a total knee arthroplasty in 2009 and experienced swelling, feeling of wrongness, and loosening of the tibial base plate that led to a revision in (b)(6) 2022.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.It has been communicated via e-mail that no further information is available.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production orders did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part numbers over 12 months and for the batch numbers based on historical data of the devices did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee system revealed that looseness of components has been identified in possible adverse effects section as a result from trauma, improper implant selection, improper implant positioning, improper fixation, and/or migration of the components.Muscle and fibrous tissue laxity can also contribute to these conditions.A review of the risk management files revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to these products and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the products failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.With the results of this investigation the root cause of this event could not be determined.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include abnormal motion over time, bone degeneration, osteolysis and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H6: health effect - clinical code.
|