• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/30/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
On 07-dec-2022, apifix was notified that patient#: (b)(6) underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2022 for reasons not specified.Upon following up with the surgeon for additional information, it was reported that there was a problem with the distal extender screw resulting in a kite angle problem.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient#: (b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2022.On 07-dec-2022, apifix was notified that patient#: (b)(6) underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2022 for reasons not specified.Upon following up with the surgeon for additional information, the following notes from the revision surgery were provided: 'there was a problem with the distal extender screw resulting in a kite angle problem, adding that the revision was necessary because a correct kite angle was not achieved during the first operation on (b)(6) 2022 due to a far leterally inserted lower extender screw.Shortly before the planned reoperation, the screw had also broken off.The patient was sympthom free.The screw could be safely and solidly inserted medially and the extender was exchanged.The surgeon and patient are very satisfied with the final result.' clinical affairs reviewed the patient's index procedure post-op x-rays which demonstrated that the extender wasn't positioned per the company's surgical technique (the patient extender angle was measured at 35°; the surgical technique states that the extender angle should be 5-15° compared to the mid-c rod).The company's incident rate of extender misalignment is 2.70%.The risk of "extender and mid-c system not properly aligned" has been assessed and found to be acceptable.Apifix is closing this complaint, but will continue to monitor this 'failure mode'; complaint trending will continue to monitor per post marketing surveillance procedure.If any further relevant information is identified, the complaint file will be reopened and a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key16100734
MDR Text Key308636357
Report Number3013461531-2022-00069
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAFS-125-050
Device Lot NumberAF-09-092-21
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/05/2023
Date Device Manufactured04/25/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age16 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-