As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced stress urinary incontinence secondary to hypermobility of the urethra, grade 3 central defect cystocele, recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary retention, flank pain, indwelling foley catheter use, positive urine culture, left leg pain, urinary incontinence, bladder pain, back pain, diarrhea, abdominal pain, dysuria, right lower flank tenderness, mixed incontinence, unable to control urine, urine culture with >100,000 e.Coli, urine culture >100,000 e.Coli and >100,000 p.Aeruginosa.Patient had a hospital admission for pyelonephritis.Patient had another manufacturer's device implanted and anterior colporrhaphy under general anesthesia.
|
Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|