• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC CLARION¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC CLARION¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number MMT-5100L
Device Problems Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Noise, Audible (3273); Intermittent Communication Failure (4038)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 12/08/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Event Description
Advanced bionics was notified that the recipient was experiencing sound quality issues and poor battery life.The recipient's device was explanted.Advanced bionics is still in the process of obtaining additional information.When additional information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The recipient's device was explanted.The recipient was reimplanted with another advanced bionics cochlear device.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Advanced bionics considers the investigation into this reportable event as closed.The external visual inspection revealed the electrode was severed.This is believed to have occurred during revision surgery.The device passed the photographic imaging inspection.System lock was verified.The electrode condition prevented an electrical test from being performed.The device passed the electrical tests performed.The device failed the residual gas analysis test.The reported complaint of sound quality could not be verified during this analysis, which was limited in some respects due to the electrode being severed prior to receipt.However, it is believed that the failure of this ics device was caused by a loss of hermetic seal, which was concluded from the assessment of the residual gas analysis data.This older device configuration is no longer manufactured.This is the final report.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The recipient was re-implanted on (b)(6) 2023 with another advanced bionics cochlear device.Advanced bionics received permission on behalf of the recipient to proceed with failure analysis on (b)(6) 2023.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CLARION¿ IMPLANT
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
28515 westinghouse place
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
lacey o'linn
28515 westinghouse place
valencia, CA 91355
MDR Report Key16151580
MDR Text Key307496299
Report Number3006556115-2023-00070
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P960058
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date03/18/1996
Device Model NumberMMT-5100L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/12/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/05/2023
05/04/2023
05/30/2023
08/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/1994
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age61 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-