• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 115; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 115; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 115
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 12/19/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Production process analysis: a review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: on (b)(6) 2022 apifix clinical trials manager was informed that patient (b)(6), index procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020, is scheduled for revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022 due to implant breakage at end-of-way.Clinical affairs reviewed the patient's pre-op plan and x-rays.Per apifix measurements, the patient's (pre-op) lateral bending (lb) was measured at 27° each curve, which constitutes 2 (two) structural curves (out of indication).Per the pssg (pediatric spine study group) measurements, patient x-rays revealed that the patient's primay cobb angle to be at 61° (out of indication).Apifix advised placement of the implant to be at t9-t10, however the surgeon placed the device at t8-t9.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient underwent a revision procedure in which "the initial implant was removed and new apifix implant reimplanted.The t8 and l3 screws remained intact.The t9 was removed and replaced with a new larger screw." risk assessment: implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing contact or high demand sports, hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory which locks the poly-axial joints, not working according to the surgical technique (e.G., minimally invasive approach and/or not using the trial tool properly).The risk for breakage due to the above increases when the implant reaches its maximal elongation.Reoperation events are a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk management file.The risk of broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable the current implant breakage rate due to any reason is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's cer (clinical evaluation report).The risk has been quantified, characterized, and documented as acceptable within a full risk assessment.Apifix is closing this complaint, but will continue to monitor this 'failure mode'; complaint trending will continue to monitor per post marketing surveillance procedure.If any further relevant information is identified, the complaint file will be reopened and a supplemental will be filed.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2022 apifix clinical trials manager was informed that patient (b)(6) was scheduled for revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Return analysis: upon receiving the explanted devices at orthopediatrics in warsaw, in, the devices were cleaned and sterilized.The devices were photographed and analyzed.The device was fractured at the mid-point of the pole.Post fracture it seems the pole remained within the body of the mid-c as indicated by wear and material deformation at the edges of the pole fracture plane and along the inner diameter of the female body.Spherical rings did show any obvious signs of wear.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 115
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key16173155
MDR Text Key307782608
Report Number3013461531-2022-00072
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290018128039
UDI-Public07290018128039
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/16/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 115
Device Catalogue NumberMUS-115-040
Device Lot NumberAF-01-01-19
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/23/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age18 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-