Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.The lot number was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release and no trends were noted.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced mixed urinary incontinence, chronic pelvic pain, device erosion in area on anterior vaginal wall of about 0.3 cm, nocturia more than twice per night, urinary frequency, stress urinary incontinence, and urge incontinence.Patient had two in-office visits with excision of device erosion via anesthesia.Patient had surgical explantation of the eroded device via unspecified anesthesia.
|