Additional information provided in h.3., h.6.And h.10.The product was not returned.A video was provided.The device preparation was not shown in this video.The eye comes into view.The device nozzle was shown being inserted into the incision.The leading haptic was in an acceptable question mark shape while inside the device at the fill line.The trailing haptic was in an acceptable position inside the optic fold.The plunger tip was observed engaging the trailing optic edge.The lens was advanced into the eye.While advancing, the leading haptic appeared to hesitate, becoming misfolded in the tip area while the plunger was advanced.As the lens was exiting the device tip, the misfolded leading haptic was facing toward the posterior.The device was retracted from the incision.The leading haptic unfurled and became positioned correctly upon completely unfolding.The trailing haptic was on the anterior optic surface.A metal instrument was used to push on the iol anterior surface to position.The instrument was then used to gently coax the haptic from the optic surface.The trailing haptic unfolded into the correct position.Product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.A non-qualified viscoelastic was indicated.Based on information provided in the file, the root cause of the leading haptic misfolding during delivery may be related to a failure to follow the ifu.The root cause for the reported pc tear cannot be determined.A non-qualified viscoelastic was indicated.The instruction for use (ifu) instructs: during device preparation and implantation of the company iol with the company preloaded delivery system, an company qualified ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd) should be used.The use of an unqualified ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (ovd) may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.The view of the posterior capsule (pc) is slightly blurred as the video appears focused anterior to the pc.While the reported event stating, "the leading haptic tore the posterior capsule," may have been apparent when viewing its occurrence directly through the surgical microscope, this video does not definitively demonstrate a pc tear caused by the leading haptic.Therefore, we cannot confirm the above event based on our review of this video.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|