The customer's reported mismatches on (b)(6) 2022 (day 3 after insertion) were confirmed.The review of the user synced data on dms data showed that the system was still adjusting.The investigation revealed that some of the customer's calibrations were entered during a period of rapid change in glucose, resulting in the calibration not being accepted and delaying the adjustment of the system, leading to transient mismatches as the ones reported.As recommended in the s4 case (b)(4), the customer understood the need of calibrating the system as prompted, when the glucose values are not changing rapidly.Once the sensor was out of the early wear adjustment period, the overall sensor performance was within expectations.No further investigation was found necessary for this complaint.As per notes, the user did not seek any medial attention and self resolved the event.In addition, the user was recommended to perform calibrations when the glucose is not changing rapidly.Per dms, user is currently using the system with up to date information and the current performance is within expectations.No further resolution was found necessary for this complaint.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.H6: investigation findings updated to 114.H6: investigation conclusions updated to 4315.
|