• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 12/14/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient#: (b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2021.On 29-dec-2022 apifix was notified that patient#: (b)(6) has been complaining about pain and overall discomfort.From the clinic notes, "patient is having back pain.  she is tearful and this pain is really bothering her.  she reports low back pain and described as an ache.  she rates the pain a 3 out of 10 but it seems to be really bothering her.  nothing seems to improve her pain.Standing or sitting of prolonged periods make pain worse.  she denies any bowel/bladder issues or extremity numbness/tingling/weakness.  family would like the apifix removed." a surgery will be scheduled as soon as the doctor has time open.On 18-jan-2023 apifix was notified that a removal surgery is planned for the beginning of february.A determination of cause of the patient's pain could not be determined with the available information.The risk of pain is a known risk.Pain associated with scoliosis is well described in the literature regardless of having corrective surgery.Pain can also be a transient complaint associated with the surgical procedure or be secondary to device failure, infection/inflammation, curve progression, screw pull-out, loosening, migration, protrusion, and prominence.The current pain rate is 3.8%.This risk has been assessed and found to be acceptable per the company cer.(dms-727 rev u).The event of pain is addressed in the ifu as a warning and as potential risks associated with the mid-c system and spinal surgery generally.Apifix was notified that the removal surgery is planned for the beginning of february.Once additional relevant details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
On 29-dec-2022 apifix was notified that patient#: (b)(6) has been complaining about pain and overall discomfort.From the clinic notes, "patient is having back pain.She is tearful and this pain is really bothering her.She reports low back pain and described as an ache.She rates the pain a 3 out of 10 but it seems to be really bothering her.Nothing seems to improve her pain.Standing or sitting of prolonged periods make pain worse.She denies any bowel/bladder issues or extremity numbness/tingling/weakness.Family would like to apifix removed." a surgery will be scheduled as soon as the doctor has time open.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On (b)(6) 2023 apifix was updated that on (b)(6) 2023 the removal surgery was performed.The patient opted out of adjusting the device; patient wanted it removed since she only wants one surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was returned to manufacturer for analysis.Engineering analysis: the explanted device was returned and was subjected to cleaning and steam sterilizing.The explant was evaluated by engineering and photographed.Wear analysis of spherical rings.Visual inspection of spherical rings showed minimal signs of wear.Some minor scratches and area of adlc separation were observed.The distal spherical ring was forcibly disassembled from the mid-c for sem analysis on hitachi s-3400n scanning electron microscope at purdue university fort wayne on november 1st, 2023.The worst looking area of the spherical ring was investigated.A scratch was examined under higher magnification.The wear observed worst location of the spherical ring was minor and nothing observed indicated that wear, or any other aspect of the device contributed to the device removal.Curve progression can result from several reasons, such as device misplacement, operating on patients out of the approved indication, implant size selection, extender misalignment, screw misplacement /migration, screw pull-out, implant breakage, infection, ratchet malfunction, and in some cases for no apparent reason.The progression can be either or both of the primary or secondary curve and may also be reported together with pain and or spine imbalance.Cause for the secondary curve progression could not be determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key16239017
MDR Text Key309148968
Report Number3013461531-2022-00078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290018128046
UDI-Public07290018128046
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/25/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberMUS-125-050
Device Lot NumberAF-02-004-20
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/10/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age17 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-