• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 3; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 3; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 3
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 10/07/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) during an endoscopic incision of intrathoracic esophagojejunal anastomosis.The esu was used with a monopolar needle knife from another manufacturer (mtw endoskie).Information regarding if a return electrode was used or type, placement, etc.Was not conveyed.Additionally, no information was provided in regards to the unit's settings.Nevertheless, postoperatively, the patient immediately complained of pain which increased over the course of days.Also, pericardiai effusion occurred and it became infected.The patient was monitored and treated in the icu (i.E., received pericardiai drainage, etc).Finally, the patient suffered ischemic liver damage.No further details were specified in regards to the patient's condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The involved esu was inspected/tested [note: no information was provided in regards with any evaluation performed on the other company's accessory (i.E., the monopolar needle knife)].The unit was found to be functioning as intended.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.Based upon the lack of information provided (i.E., not knowing the exact location of the anastomosis in relation to the pericardium; modes/settings of the esu, etc.; cause of the pericardiai effusion, etc.), there are many possible scenarios that may have caused the event.Possibly, a perforation occurred at the incision site (via mechanically or thermally) which resulted in the patient's complications.However, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the incident.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 3
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key16245650
MDR Text Key308156742
Report Number9610614-2023-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K190823
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/26/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 3
Device Catalogue Number10160-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/16/2023
Date Manufacturer Received01/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/12/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Life Threatening;
Patient Age41 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight61 KG
-
-