• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. NIMBUS 4; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. NIMBUS 4; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Model Number 649015
Device Problem Deflation Problem (1149)
Patient Problem Pressure Sores (2326)
Event Date 10/30/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On 13 jan 2023, arjo became aware of the second event that involved the same bedridden patient with very little mobility as in the medwatch ref.3005619970-2022-00032.This report refers to the event that occurred on (b)(6) 2022, the patient sustained a sacral ulcer with exposed underlying tissue.The patient used at that time the nimbus system that consisted of the nimbus pump serial number (b)(4) and the nimbus professional mattress serial number (b)(4).The patient¿s wound required daily monitoring using the bandages, the hydrofiber was applied after mechanical debridement.The system involved in the event was allegedly faulty, the customer staff informed about the pump failure and the mattress deflation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.Results of the analysis will be provided to the follow-up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During collecting the information for the event with arjo internal number (b)(4) (medwatch ref.3005619970-2022-00032) on (b)(6) 2023 arjo became aware that the same patient developed the serious injury (a sacral ulcer with exposed underlying tissue) while was laying on the nimbus system.The patient¿s wound required daily monitoring using the bandages, the hydrofiber was applied after mechanical debridement.The system involved in the event (pump (b)(6); mattress (b)(6)) was allegedly faulty, the customer staff informed about the pump failure and the mattress deflation.The evaluation of the claimed system conducted at the arjo service centre showed that the pump worked correctly but there was needed to replace few parts (front casing, blue pillow, grey gasket, silent bag, missing screw); the mattress had one faulty torso cell (weld failure) and a faulty leg elbow 1/2 hose.The alarm system worked correctly, which means that if an alarm situation was detected an indicator would illuminate on the top and front of the pump and an audible warning would be heard.The alarm system activates after the system detects lower pressure in the mattress.During the investigation, it was established that the patient developed the injury about 10 days before the arjo system was claimed as faulty.It is unknown whether the system malfunction occurred before the patient sustained the pressure injury.Pressure injuries are complex and are a result of many factors including: advanced age, immobility, co-morbidities, microclimate, incontinence, and lack of being turned or repositioned frequently enough.The instruction for use id.649933 states that one of the key factors in patient care is a patient¿s skin care management protocol and that if the patient¿s condition changes therapy should be reviewed.¿the nimbus systems are indicated for the prevention and/or management of all categories of pressure ulcer, when combined with an individualised, comprehensive pressure ulcer protocol: for example, repositioning, nutritional support, skin care.Selection should be based upon a holistic assessment of the patient¿s individual care needs.These systems represent one aspect of a pressure ulcer management protocol if existing wounds do not improve or the patient¿s condition changes the overall therapy regimen should be reviewed by the prescribing clinician.¿ in the claimed event, it is unknown whether the therapy regimen has been adapted to the changing condition of the bedridden patient with very little mobility.Sum up, the arjo nimbus 4 system was used while the patient's condition deteriorated, therefore it played role in the event.The involved system was malfunctioned therefore it failed to meet its specification.It is unknown whether the therapy regimen has been adapted to the changing condition of the patient¿s which probably resulted in the pressure injury development.This complaint is deemed reportable following the customer statement indicating development of pressure injury, which has been deemed a serious injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NIMBUS 4
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.
no. 158 fangzhou road, sip
suzhou, jiangsu 21502 4
CH  215024
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.
no. 158 fangzhou road, sip
suzhou, jiangsu 21502 4
CH   215024
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key16251966
MDR Text Key308231417
Report Number3005619970-2023-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number649015
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/13/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight71 KG
-
-