Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).One picture was attached to the complaint file in which the one distal section of the device was shown.Five compressed conditions can be appreciated in the shaft.It was noted that as a result of the severity of the compressed condition, the braided mesh was exposed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The issue documented that the catheter was severely deformed was confirmed based on the appearance of the device.The resistance condition reported by the customer was not able to be evaluated since a functional analysis needs to be performed, however, the multiple compressed conditions may contribute to this.This investigation was performed based only on the photo provided.The device said to be involved was reported as discarded, as such, no further evaluation will be conducted.If additional information is received at a later date, this investigation will be updated accordingly.The instructions for use (ifu) warns to never advance or withdraw an intraluminal device against resistance.Movement or force of catheter or guide wire against resistance could dislodge a clot, perforate a vessel wall, or severely damage the catheter and/or guide wire.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
As reported by the field, the physician encountered a lot of resistance with the 132cm large bore 71 catheter (ic71132ug, 30823351) during the process of delivering a 5x33 embotrap ii revascularization device (et007533, unknown lot).The physician retracted the devices and observed that the catheter was severely deformed.A new catheter was switched to complete the surgery.There was no patient injury reported.Additional information received indicated that the stent was retracted when resistance was encountered.There had been no difficulties attaching another device to the complaint device.There were no procedural delays due to the event.The target vessel/site being treated was the left middle cerebral artery.
|