A visual, functional, and dimensional inspection was performed on the returned device and identified a pinhole balloon rupture and a leak.The reported failure to advance could not be evaluated as the exact anatomical conditions encountered by the device used during the procedure could not be replicated in the test laboratory.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents.The investigation determined the reported failure to advance appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|