• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PR SWAN GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER FOR INSERTION VIA SUPERIOR VENA CAVA; CATHETER, FLOW DIRECTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PR SWAN GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER FOR INSERTION VIA SUPERIOR VENA CAVA; CATHETER, FLOW DIRECTED Back to Search Results
Model Number D97120F5
Device Problem Pacing Problem (1439)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/11/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event of pacing issue was confirmed.Continuity testing confirmed a full open condition of the proximal circuit.The distal circuit was found to be continuous.A cut down of the catheter body was performed just proximal of the proximal electrode to expose the pacing leadwires.After cutting the balloon and pulling the leadwire out of the proximal electrode port, it was confirmed that the proximal leadwire was broken inside catheter tube under proximal electrode.It was confirmed that the proximal circuit was continuous from broken lead wire to proximal connector pin.The balloon inflated clear and concentric with 1.3 cc air and remained inflated for 5 min.Without leakage.No visible damage or defect was observed from the balloon, windings and catheter body.Further evaluation regarding related quality issues is under investigation.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as a part of the monthly review.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a swan ganz was unable to pace from the beginning of use after catheter insertion.The issue was resolved by replacing the catheter.Information such as what kind of surgery or examination the catheter was used for or if the patient had cardiac conduction defect is unknown.Patient demographic information was requested but unavailable.The customer suspected the catheter malfunction since it functioned properly after the catheter replacement.There were no patient complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Engineering evaluation was completed.A capa was initiated for this issue and a product risk assessment was needed.A device history record review was completed and documented that device met all specifications upon distribution.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as a part of the monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SWAN GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER FOR INSERTION VIA SUPERIOR VENA CAVA
Type of Device
CATHETER, FLOW DIRECTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan diaz
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
MDR Report Key16277519
MDR Text Key308572618
Report Number2015691-2023-10475
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K822723
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberD97120F5
Device Catalogue NumberD97120F5
Device Lot Number64520444
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/19/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/11/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/01/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/03/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-