Based on the investigation analysis, the reported mismatch between bg and sg on (b)(6) 2023, could not be confirmed due to missing data referenced by the user, but a similar mismatch was observed that day.However, it was observed that there was transient noise in the optical channel 2 days before the event, likely impacted by the condition of the hydrogel, though unclear, at the time in-vivo.There was no sign of sensor malfunction that would result in the temporary mismatch reported on (b)(6) 2023.Thus, the exact cause of the reported event could not be determined.Temporary mismatch could occur if past calibrations entered were not accurate, or the calibration on the day of the event was reported in error, or it could be due to occasional differences that the system produces.The overall sensor performance was evaluated, and it was performing within expectations.The user did not seek any medical attention or self-treatment.The user is currently using the system with up-to-date information and no further investigation is required.H3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.H6.Investigation findings updated to 213.H6.Investigation conclusions updated to 67.
|