It was reported that the emboshield embolic protection device was positioned over the barewire and a non-abbott peripheral atherectomy device was advanced over the barewire to perform atherectomy in the heavily calcified popliteal artery.During removal of the atherectomy device, it became stuck with the barewire, so all devices were removed as a single unit.There was no reported adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.A new emboshield and jetstream were used to complete the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned product.The reported difficulty to remove was confirmed as the barewire was frozen in the non-abbott device (jetstream xc).A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints reported from this lot.The investigation determined that the reported difficulty was due to procedural related circumstances.It is likely that clearance between the inner diameter of the non-abbott atherectomy device and outer diameter of the barewire was reduced, likely due to anatomical conditions, resulting in the devices becoming frozen together during use.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|