CONCORD MANUFACTURING LIBERTY SELECT CYCLER ASSY(NON-VALUATED); SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 180343 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Hernia (2240); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Date 12/01/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2023 this patient on peritoneal dialysis (pd) reported they had a hernia.Therefore, more follow-up was performed with the patient¿s pd nurse.It was reported that the patient began pd therapy in (b)(6) 2021.Per the nurse, it is believed the patient developed an abdominal hernia after start of pd treatment.However, the nurse indicated this could not be confirmed.It was stated the patient developed symptoms of swelling.As a result, in (b)(6) 2022 (exact date not provided), the patient required repair of the abdominal hernia.However, per the nurse, the patient continued to experience symptoms of swelling with the hernia.Therefore, the patient had the prescribed fill volume reduced from 2000 ml to 1800 ml.The nurse indicated the patient is scheduled to see the surgeon again (date not provided) to evaluate for an additional repair.The nurse confirmed the patient has not had any adverse effects from use of any fresenius device, or product.Additionally, the nurse provided there were no cycler malfunctions or increased intra-peritoneal volume (iipv) events related to the reported hernia.The nurse stated the swelling/hernia was likely due to the normal physiology of pd treatment.The patient reportedly continues pd treatment on the same cycler without any adverse effects.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. clinical investigation: a temporal relationship exists between peritoneal dialysis (pd) therapy with the liberty select cycler and the patient¿s abdominal hernia (characterized by swelling) which required subsequent repair.Hernia is a well-documented complication in pd patient¿s due to an expected increased intra-abdominal pressure from the dialysate during pd treatment.Nonetheless, the concomitant use of the fresenius cycler to facilitate dialysis cannot be excluded as a contributory factor in the event.However, currently there is no reported allegation or objective evidence that a liberty select cycler malfunction or product deficiency caused serious harm to the patient.
|
|
Event Description
|
On 24/jan/2023, this patient on peritoneal dialysis (pd) reported they had a hernia.Therefore, more follow-up was performed with the patient¿s pd nurse.It was reported that the patient began pd therapy in (b)(6) of 2021.Per the nurse, it is believed the patient developed an abdominal hernia after start of pd treatment.However, the nurse indicated this could not be confirmed.It was stated the patient developed symptoms of swelling.As a result, in (b)(6) 2022 (exact date not provided), the patient required repair of the abdominal hernia.However, per the nurse, the patient continued to experience symptoms of swelling with the hernia.Therefore, the patient had the prescribed fill volume reduced from 2000 ml to 1800 ml.The nurse indicated the patient is scheduled to see the surgeon again (date not provided) to evaluate for an additional repair.The nurse confirmed the patient has not had any adverse effects from use of any fresenius device, or product.Additionally, the nurse provided there were no cycler malfunctions or increased intra-peritoneal volume (iipv) events related to the reported hernia.The nurse stated the swelling/hernia was likely due to the normal physiology of pd treatment.The patient reportedly continues pd treatment on the same cycler without any adverse effects.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|