|
Model Number Z900KL |
Device Problem
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/06/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
On january 19, 2023, nakanishi became aware of a malfunction of a nsk handpiece through a complaint input into the complaint database by a distributor ((b)(4)).According to the distributor, there are two devices suspected to be involved in the event, but the dental office could not identify which one of the devices actually caused the following event.Therefore, nakanishi is submitting two separate mdrs for this event.This mdr is regarding the handpiece with the serial number (b)(4).Details are as follows: the event occurred around (b)(6) 2023.(the exact date is unknown).A dentist was performing a dental procedure on a patient's tooth using the z900kl handpiece (serial no.(b)(4)).During the procedure, the bur was released from the handpiece and landed at the back of the patient's throat.The bur was recovered by the dentist and the patient was not injured in the event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The same adverse event in this report has been reported to the fda separately by the distributor, (b)(4), under report number (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event from the distributor, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device [report no.(b)(4)].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject (b)(6) device [0bj80300].There were no problems observed during manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.There were no records indicating nakanishi (the manufacturer) repaired the device since the device was shipped.Nakanishi received the repair record from nsk america (the distributor), which included the detailed information about the repair nsk america carried out.Nakanishi kept the repair record in a file.B) nakanishi conducted a rotation check of the returned device and observed no abnormalities in the rotation.C) nakanishi measured the bur retention force and observed a value within device specifications.Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: a) nakanishi could not identify the exact cause of the bur separation from the returned handpiece because nakanishi was not able to replicate the reported event and did not observe any abnormalities leading to the bur releasing from the handpiece in the rotation check and the measurement above.B) in spite of the fact that nakanishi could not identify the cause, nakanishi took the following actions to be safe: b.1) nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.B.2) nakanishi reported the above evaluation results to the distributor and directed the distributor to remind the user of the importance of using the device as instructed in the operation manual.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|