• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 22443-19
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Difficult to Advance (2920); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/12/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that after device preparation, without issue, the filter was advanced into the common carotid artery; however, resistance was noted when advancing distal to the heavily calcified, moderately tortuous, 60% stenosed, de novo lesion in the right internal carotid artery (rica).Once at the parking place, deployment was attempted, but completely failed, so the device was removed without issue.Once outside the anatomy, it was noted that the tip of the filter was bent and separated.There was no adverse patient effect or clinically significant delay in procedure.A second device was prepped without issue.The filter was delivered without issue to it¿s parking spot and used without issue.After the acculink carotid stent was implanted, the filter was removed without issue, using the recovery catheter.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual analysis was performed on the returned product.The reported difficult to advance was unable to be confirmed as it was based on circumstances of the procedure.The reported kink/bend was confirmed.The reported separation of the dc pod which may have contributed to deployment failure was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no other similar complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported difficulties.Based on the reported information and evaluation of the returned unit, the deployment failure may be the result of the separated distal shaft/dc pod.Although a definitive cause for the separation could not be determined, it may be possible that the distal shaft of the delivery catheter was restricted or entrapped within the heavily calcified and heavily tortuous anatomy, and during positioning with resistance, the separation occurred resulting in deployment failure; however, this could not be confirmed.There was no difficulty noted during preparation, and the filter was noted to be fully loaded into the dc pod suggesting that the damage was not pre-existing.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the initial medwatch report, the following information was reported: it was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified, moderately tortuous, 60% stenosed, de novo lesion in the right internal carotid artery (ica).An emboshield nav6 embolic protection system (eps) was prepared without issue and advanced through the introducer, passed the lesion stenosis and passed the lesion tortuosity with slight resistance.The nav6 was desired to be left in this segment, so the filter could be deployed in the targeted ica region, however, it did not go further, the filter could not be deployed from the delivery catheter into the ica.The white handle was pulled back, and it was observed under imaging that the filter did not come to the open position.The white handle was brought back to its position and tried again, however; the filter did not open with the second attempt.The nav6 was removed with the delivery catheter, and it was found that the delivery catheter pod had separated [and it was moving on the guide wire].A new nav6 and an acculink carotid stent were placed to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 2024168
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key16368592
MDR Text Key309581252
Report Number2024168-2023-01452
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
K141678
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number22443-19
Device Lot Number2021761
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/20/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/13/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/17/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
0.038 CONGER GLIDE WIRE; 5F VERTEBRAL CATHETER; 6F NEUROCATCH LONG INTRODUCER
-
-