• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A21
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Fatigue (1849); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 03/14/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 21mm 11500a inspiris aortic valve was been placed under consideration for valve-in-valve intervention after an implant duration of four (4) years, one (1) month due to unknown reasons.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient prosthesis mismatch (ppm) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size.Its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through a normally functioning prosthetic valve.All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported and later learned through medical records that a patient with a 21mm 11500a inspiris aortic valve underwent a valve in valve after an implant duration of four (4) years, three (3) months due to severe aortic stenosis, one non-functioning leaflet and ppm.A 23mm sapien was implanted with fracture of the bioprosthetic valve.The patient presented with chf, nyha class 3.Per medical records: the patient was referred to ct surgery for evaluation of aortic root enlargement and redo savr, given concern for ppm with initial savt< however, due to comorbidities including thrombocytopenia, along with previous stroke /tia, a decision was made to procedure with tavr viv with fracture of his surgical valve.An echo obtained post month post savr showed elevated gradient consistent with ppm.
 
Event Description
It was reported and later learned through medical records that a patient with a 21mm 11500a inspiris aortic valve underwent a valve in valve after an implant duration of four (4) years, three (3) months due to severe aortic stenosis caused by ppm.A 23mm sapien was implanted.The patient presented with fatigue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, the nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 21mm 11500a inspiris aortic valve was been placed under consideration for valve-in-valve intervention after an implant duration of four (4) years, one (1) month due to severe aortic stenosis.The patient presented with fatigue.Per medical records, one (1) month post implantation of 21mm 11500a valve echo showed elevated mean gradient consistent with ppm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key16369269
MDR Text Key309461748
Report Number2015691-2023-10783
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194975
UDI-Public(01)00690103194975(17)200726
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Expiration Date07/26/2020
Device Model Number11500A21
Device Catalogue Number11500A21
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/19/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/13/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/16/2023
03/21/2023
03/22/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/09/2023
03/21/2023
03/24/2023
Date Device Manufactured07/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-