Weight, ethnicity: unknown/ not provided.An attempt was made to obtain missing information; however, the account did not provide the information.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's operative eye.Patient has decreased vision and their eyes are working too hard.The patient has double vision and pain since surgery.First identified in post-operative (op) visit.Symptoms persisted for 5 months.Another johnson & johnson lens (same model and 19.5 diopter) was implanted as a replacement.There was no vitrectomy, incision enlargement, or sutures required.The patient fully recovered.No other information was provided.
|
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: feb.13, 2023.Section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the suspect intraocular lens (iol) was received and visual inspection performed.The lens was damaged and had a damaged haptic.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue were identified.The complaint issues; diplopia, suboptimal results, pain eye, and explant were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|