• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH UNK - PLATES: 3.5 MM LCP EXTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL HUMERUS PLATE; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH UNK - PLATES: 3.5 MM LCP EXTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL HUMERUS PLATE; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Discomfort (2330); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Brand name, common device name, procode, manufacturer name, city and state, product information, pma/510k: this report is for an unknown plates: 3.5 mm lcp extra-articular distal humerus plate/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes reports an event in south korea as follows: this report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: jung, h.S., won, y.S., choi, y.S.And lee, j.S.(2022), risk factors for hardware related complications after extra articular distal humerus fracture fixation using an anatomical locking plate, european journal of trauma and emergency surgery, vol.Xx (xx), pages 1-7 (south korea).The aim of this retrospective study is to identify the incidence and risk factors of hardware-related complications in patients treated with anatomical locking plate fixation for extraarticular distal humerus fractures.Between january 2013 to december 2020, a total 33 patients were treated fracture fixation was accomplished by applying a 3.5 mm extra-articular distal humerus locking plate (eadhp) (depuy synthes, inc.) on the posterior surface of the humerus.4 patients were excluded because of incomplete clinical or radiographic records (n=3) or an additional plate used with the eadhp (n=1).The remaining 29 patients included group a, n=10 (3 female and 7 male), and group b, n=19 (7 female and 12 male) with a mean age of 34.5 ± 17.6 (range 21¿75 years).On axial ct, hardware protrusion on the lateral aspect of the distal humerus was evaluated.The presence/absence of hardware-related complications was investigated.Hardware-related complications were defined as the occurrence of skin prominence on the plate and subsequent discomfort in activities of daily living at the final follow-up (fig.1).The decision to perform hardware removal surgery was made by the patient and surgeon together based on the patient¿s needs and discomfort due to hardware insertion.The number of patients who underwent hardware removal was significantly greater in group b (16/19) than in group a (4/10).However, the lateral body length was greater in group a than in group b (44.5 ± 4.8 vs.39.5 ± 3.7, p = 0.007).The plate length also significantly differed between the two groups (p = 0.008).12 of 19 (63%) patients in group b used short-hole plates (six holes), while 9 of 10 (90%) patients in group a used long-hole plates (eight holes).The following complications were reported as follows: n=19 patients of group b that used short-hole plates (six holes) developed 66% hardware-related complications.A 26-year-old man reports skin prominence and discomfort during activities of daily living and requests implant removal at final follow-up.1 out of 10 of group a and all of 19 patients of group b had hardware protrusion.4 out of 10 of group a and 16 out of 19 patients of group b underwent hardware removal.This report involves one unk - plates: 3.5 mm lcp extra-articular distal humerus plate.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - PLATES: 3.5 MM LCP EXTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL HUMERUS PLATE
Type of Device
PLATE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 19380
3035526892
MDR Report Key16430008
MDR Text Key310129446
Report Number8030965-2023-02239
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age26 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-