|
Model Number 105 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Discomfort (2330); Hypoesthesia (2352); Numbness (2415)
|
Event Date 03/09/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Livanova usa, inc.Submits this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation, based on information that livanova has obtained, but may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.This report does not constitute an admission, or a conclusion by fda or anyone else, that the device, livanova, or livanova's employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any "defects¿ or "malfunctions¿.These words are incorporated into the fda 3500a medwatch form by the fda, and livanova objects to their use.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a full revision due to tingling, numbness, and pain.The explanted generator was received but product analysis is still underway.No other relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Product analysis was completed on the returned generator and lead.Generator analysis was completed and approved.An interrogation and a system diagnostic test were performed.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs and a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation (shows an ifi=no condition) was performed.The header shows to be detached from the pulse generator case, which is not typical in a surgical procedure.It is very likely that the header separation occurred during or after the explant process.This is based on the location of the tool marks observed on the pulse generator case and header.Therefore, this observation/finding is not considered a device failure, but instead the result of extensive manipulation of the product during the explant process.Other than the noted header detachment anomaly (visual analysis), there were no performance, or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Lead analysis was completed and approved.Note that since a significant portion of the lead assembly (body) including the electrode array section was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed during the functional analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.The condition of the returned lead portion is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|