• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number D134801
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Paralysis (1997); Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 01/04/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: yan qd, gong kz, chen xh, chen jh, xu z, wang ww, zhang fl.Comparison of second-generation cryoballoon ablation and quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index for atrial fibrillation.Bratisl lek listy.2023 jan 4.Doi: 10.4149/bll_2023_023.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 36598303.Since no device has been received for analysis, no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record evaluation (mre) cannot be conducted because no lot number was not provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: yan qd, gong kz, chen xh, chen jh, xu z, wang ww, zhang fl.Comparison of second-generation cryoballoon ablation and quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index for atrial fibrillation.Bratisl lek listy.2023 jan 4.Doi: 10.4149/bll_2023_023.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 36598303.Abstract: background: radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation are the main methods of catheter ablation for patients with atrial fi brillation (af).However, different ablation catheters have different effi cacy and complication rates.This study aimed to compare the effi cacy and complication rates of quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index ( rfca-ai) with those of second-generation cryoballoon ablation (cba-2).Methods: a total of 230 consecutive patients with symptomatic af undergoing a fi rst ablation procedure of cba-2 (92 patients) or rfca-ai (138 patients) were enrolled in this study.Results: the late recurrence rate in the cba-2 group was higher than that in the rfca-ai group (p=0.012).Subgroup analysis showed the same result in patients with paroxysmal af (paf) (p=0.039), but no difference was found in patients with persistent af (p=0.21).The average operation duration in the cba-2 group (85 (75¿99.5) min) was shorter than that in the rfca-ai group (100 (84.5¿120) min), but the average exposure time in the cba-2 group (17.36 (13.87¿22.49) min vs 5.49 (4.00¿8.24) min; p < 0.0001) and x-ray dose (223.25 (149.15¿336.95) min vs 109.15 (80.75¿168.7) min; p < 0.0001) were significantly longer than those in rfca-ai group.The patients were then divided into a late recurrent group and a late recurrence-free group.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that left atrial diameter (lad), early recurrence, and methods of ablation (cryoballoon ablation) were independent risk factors for late recurrence after af ablation.Conclusion: for patients with paf, cba-2 was inferior to rfca-ai.Furthermore, although rfca-ai had an equivalent complication rate and longer operation time than cba-2, it also had a shorter exposure time and required a lower radiation dose.The early recurrence of af and lad were independent risk factors for predicting late recurrence after af ablation.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense webster device possibly associated with reported adverse events: smarttouch sf catheter.Other biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: carto 3 system , lasso mapping catheter.Non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: n/a.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with biosense webster suspected device in rfca-ai group: qty 1 phrenic nerve palsy - (intervention not discussed).Qty 2 cardiac tamponade (intervention not discussed).Qty 1 pericardial effusion (intervention not discussed).Article reports all patients with complications were improved before discharge, and those with phrenic nerve palsy recovered.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key16436924
MDR Text Key310168283
Report Number2029046-2023-00372
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
UDI-Device Identifier10846835010145
UDI-Public10846835010145
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD134801
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/30/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CARTO 3 SYSTEM; LASSO MAPPING CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-