Model Number D134801 |
Device Problem
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Paralysis (1997); Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
Event Date 01/04/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: yan qd, gong kz, chen xh, chen jh, xu z, wang ww, zhang fl.Comparison of second-generation cryoballoon ablation and quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index for atrial fibrillation.Bratisl lek listy.2023 jan 4.Doi: 10.4149/bll_2023_023.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 36598303.Since no device has been received for analysis, no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record evaluation (mre) cannot be conducted because no lot number was not provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: yan qd, gong kz, chen xh, chen jh, xu z, wang ww, zhang fl.Comparison of second-generation cryoballoon ablation and quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index for atrial fibrillation.Bratisl lek listy.2023 jan 4.Doi: 10.4149/bll_2023_023.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 36598303.Abstract: background: radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation are the main methods of catheter ablation for patients with atrial fi brillation (af).However, different ablation catheters have different effi cacy and complication rates.This study aimed to compare the effi cacy and complication rates of quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index ( rfca-ai) with those of second-generation cryoballoon ablation (cba-2).Methods: a total of 230 consecutive patients with symptomatic af undergoing a fi rst ablation procedure of cba-2 (92 patients) or rfca-ai (138 patients) were enrolled in this study.Results: the late recurrence rate in the cba-2 group was higher than that in the rfca-ai group (p=0.012).Subgroup analysis showed the same result in patients with paroxysmal af (paf) (p=0.039), but no difference was found in patients with persistent af (p=0.21).The average operation duration in the cba-2 group (85 (75¿99.5) min) was shorter than that in the rfca-ai group (100 (84.5¿120) min), but the average exposure time in the cba-2 group (17.36 (13.87¿22.49) min vs 5.49 (4.00¿8.24) min; p < 0.0001) and x-ray dose (223.25 (149.15¿336.95) min vs 109.15 (80.75¿168.7) min; p < 0.0001) were significantly longer than those in rfca-ai group.The patients were then divided into a late recurrent group and a late recurrence-free group.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that left atrial diameter (lad), early recurrence, and methods of ablation (cryoballoon ablation) were independent risk factors for late recurrence after af ablation.Conclusion: for patients with paf, cba-2 was inferior to rfca-ai.Furthermore, although rfca-ai had an equivalent complication rate and longer operation time than cba-2, it also had a shorter exposure time and required a lower radiation dose.The early recurrence of af and lad were independent risk factors for predicting late recurrence after af ablation.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense webster device possibly associated with reported adverse events: smarttouch sf catheter.Other biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: carto 3 system , lasso mapping catheter.Non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: n/a.Adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with biosense webster suspected device in rfca-ai group: qty 1 phrenic nerve palsy - (intervention not discussed).Qty 2 cardiac tamponade (intervention not discussed).Qty 1 pericardial effusion (intervention not discussed).Article reports all patients with complications were improved before discharge, and those with phrenic nerve palsy recovered.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|