Reported event: an event regarding wear involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was confirmed via evaluation of the returned device and clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device indicated that the insert is worn.The damage present on the posterior portion was consistent with delamination and material loss.The damage on the articulating surface of the insert is consistent with burnishing, scratching, and third body indentations; which are common damage modes of uhmwpe.The yellow discoloration observed on the tibial insert is consistent with the absorption of synovial fluid by the device.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "this case concerns a female patient who underwent a cemented primary cruciate retaining triathlon total knee arthroplasty.Approximately five years later the patient required revision for polyethylene wear and anterior tibial subluxation.I can confirm that the primary procedure took place and that a revision procedure took place since i can see a post revision x-ray and the date of explant was noted in the summary.However i do not have any further documentation of the revision procedure.I cannot determine the root cause of this event with certainty.The root causes of polyethylene wear with anterior subluxation are multifactorial.These include surgical technique factors, patient factors including activity level and bmi and implant factors.With a posterior cruciate ligament retaining implant if the posterior cruciate ligament is left relatively tight, that creates a relatively tight flexion space which can result in wear of the polyethylene posteriorly.Ligament balancing and restoration of kinematics also impact the wear of polyethylene." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient was revised.Visual inspection of the returned device indicated that the insert is worn.The damage present on the posterior portion was consistent with delamination and material loss.The damage on the articulating surface of the insert is consistent with burnishing, scratching, and third body indentations; which are common damage modes of uhmwpe.The yellow discoloration observed on the tibial insert is consistent with the absorption of synovial fluid by the device.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated the following: "this case concerns a female patient who underwent a cemented primary cruciate retaining triathlon total knee arthroplasty.Approximately five years later the patient required revision for polyethylene wear and anterior tibial subluxation.I cannot determine the root cause of this event with certainty.The root causes of polyethylene wear with anterior subluxation are multifactorial.These include surgical technique factors, patient factors including activity level and bmi and implant factors.With a posterior cruciate ligament retaining implant if the posterior cruciate ligament is left relatively tight, that creates a relatively tight flexion space which can result in wear of the polyethylene posteriorly.Ligament balancing and restoration of kinematics also impact the wear of polyethylene." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Correction - d6a.
|