• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL SF; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL SF; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Stroke/CVA (1770)
Event Date 01/23/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed li x, liu t, cui b, zhang j, chen y, wu g.Efficacy and safety ablation index-guided high-energy linear ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: pvi plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation.J clin med.2023 jan 12;12(2):619.Doi: 10.3390/jcm12020619.Pmid: 36675552; pmcid: pmc9862717.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed li x, liu t, cui b, zhang j, chen y, wu g.Efficacy and safety ablation index-guided high-energy linear ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: pvi plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation.J clin med.2023 jan 12;12(2):619.Doi: 10.3390/jcm12020619.Pmid: 36675552; pmcid: pmc9862717.Objective and methods: background: for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (af), whether linear ablation should be performed remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety for ablation index (ai)-guided high-energy linear ablation of mitral isthmus (mi) and left atrial (la) posterior box isolation is still unclear.The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and clinical success rate of pulmonary veins isolation (pvi) combined with linear ablation of la roof and posterior inferior (posterior wall isolation) and mi compare with the pvi-alone method in patients of persistent af.Methods and results: 362 consecutive persistent af patients were enrolled from two electrophysiology centers.A total of 200 cases were in pvi-plus group and 162 cases were in pvi-alone group.The pvi-alone group received wide circumferential isolation of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins.Pvi combined with linear ablation of left atrial posterior wall isolation (lapwi)and mi were performed in the pvi-plus group.The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia.After 24 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was achieved in 73.5% of the patients in the pvi-plus group and 62.5% in the pvi-alone group (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91, log rank p = 0.012).The procedure-related complication rates were 2.5% in pvi-plus group and 1.9% in pvi-alone group (p = 0.808).Conclusion: in this study, the ablation strategy of ablation (pvi plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation) was feasible and safe for persistent af patients.Compared with the pvi-alone method, it improved outcomes in patients with persistent af.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense webster device possibly associated with reported adverse events: thermocool smart-touch stsf.Other biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: carto 3, visitag module, and multipolar mapping catheter (pentaray).Non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: n/a.Adverse event(s) and interventions: 1 postoperative ischemic stroke who recovered without severe morbidity after unspecified treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL SF
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key16461661
MDR Text Key310452660
Report Number2029046-2023-00418
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/01/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNK_CARTO 3; UNK_PENTARAY; UNK_VISITAG SURPOINT¿ EPU
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-