Model Number G125 |
Device Problems
Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439)
|
Patient Problem
Asystole (4442)
|
Event Date 01/18/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) exhibited noise, oversensing and pacing inhibition of over two seconds on the right ventricular channel.It was determined that this was due to electromagnetic interference (emi).Additionally anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) was inappropriately delivered.It was discussed to contact the patient in order to address the source of the emi.No changes were performed on the device.This device remains in service.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) exhibited noise, oversensing and pacing inhibition of over two seconds on the right ventricular channel.It was determined that this was due to electromagnetic interference (emi).Additionally anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) was inappropriately delivered.It was discussed to contact the patient in order to address the source of the emi.No changes were performed on the device.This device remains in service.No further adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received detailing that the issues with the device continue to appear and myopotential oversensing was the most likely root cause and discarded the idea of emi.Further evaluation of the patient was discussed.This device remains in service.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) exhibited noise, oversensing and pacing inhibition of over two seconds on the right ventricular channel.It was determined that this was due to electromagnetic interference (emi).Additionally anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) was inappropriately delivered.It was discussed to contact the patient in order to address the source of the emi.No changes were performed on the device.This device remains in service.No further adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received detailing that the issues with the device continue to appear and myopotential oversensing was the most likely root cause and discarded the idea of emi.Further evaluation of the patient was discussed.This device remains in service.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|