|
Model Number RFX058-115-08 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891)
|
Event Date 03/01/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received a report that the patient had a previously ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm that was coiled and had a neck remnant that had grown and required treatment, as well as a posterior wall component that was unprotected by prior coils.Th physician decided that flow diversion was most adequate treatment for this case.His plan was to place the pipeline distally in ipsilateral (right) a2 into right a1.Accessing the a2 was difficult, requiring multiple attempts with multiple types of wires.Once the a2 was accessed with the wire, phenom27 was advanced past the target to begin pipeline placement.Measurements were obtained and ped2-300-16 was chosen by the physician to be optimal size.The device was loaded into the phenom27 and deployed normally.Follow up imaging displayed adequate placement and patency of the device.During recovery overnight the patient experienced an intracranial hemorrhage.The pipeline was used for an indication that is approved (on-label).The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm with a max diameter of 2.8mm and a 3mm neck diameter.The landing zone was 2.2mm at the distal end and 2.6mm at the proximal end.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was moderate.Dapt (dual antiplatelet treatment) was administered.The angiographic result post procedure was successful flow diversion of acom aneurysm with pipeline embolization device.Placed distally in right a2, proximally in right a1.Ancillary devices include a penumbra neuron max sheath, navien 058 guide catheter, penom27 microcatheter, stryker synchro2 guidewire (x3), synchro10 guidewire, and scientia aristotle24 guidewire.Additional information was received that the patient was doing much better.The patient received external ventricular drain and was intubated (on (b)(6) 2023).The patient is improving, and the physician placed a shunt this week.The physician was unsure of the cause but per physician was confident it was not the pipeline.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received reported that the patient needed an evd and intubation.The patient is recovering and had a shunt placed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|