• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) SEE H.10

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) SEE H.10 Back to Search Results
Model Number 256045
Device Problem False Positive Result (1227)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/09/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device brand name:bd veritor¿ system for rapid detection of flu a+b clia-waved kit.Common device name:antigens, cf (including cf control), influenza virus a, b, c initial reporter address: col cuauhtemoc av del bosque 139 a device evaluation and/or device history review is antici.Pated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that bd veritor¿ system for rapid detection of flu a+b clia-waved kit 80% of results obtain positive results.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: the client comments that when using the cartridges for the influenza test with veritor, 80% of the results obtained have been positive for influenza type b.The test can analyze both influenza a and b but they have noticed a marked bias towards type b positivity.They are concerned that the veritor cartridge is failing because this marked tendency to type b does not seem logical to them.Quality control of each kit, with positive control and negative control, has been satisfactory.They started using a new kit and with a different reader and so far have not noticed a bias.The client asks to know if the batch is working well, if there have been any other reports.
 
Event Description
It was reported that bd veritor¿ system for rapid detection of flu a+b clia-waved kit 80% of results obtain positive results.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: the client comments that when using the cartridges for the influenza test with veritor, 80% of the results obtained have been positive for influenza type b.The test can analyze both influenza a and b but they have noticed a marked bias towards type b positivity.They are concerned that the veritor cartridge is failing because this marked tendency to type b does not seem logical to them.Quality control of each kit, with positive control and negative control, has been satisfactory.They started using a new kit and with a different reader and so far have not noticed a bias.The client asks to know if the batch is working well, if there have been any other reports.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6 investigation summary: this statement is to summarize the investigation results regarding a complaint that alleges received discrepant results when using kit rapid detection of kit flu a+b 30 test physician veritor (material # 256045), batch number 2269666."customer informed that when using the cartridges for the influenza test with veritor, 80% of the results obtained have been positive for influenza type b.The test can analyze both influenza a and b, but they have noticed a marked bias towards type b positivity.They are concerned that the veritor cartridge is failing because this marked tendency to type b does not seem logical to them".Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate discrepant result complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples, if applicable.An investigation (bhr analysis and retain sample analysis) was performed on the batch number provided and results were acceptable, no relevant issue was found.No return samples were received; therefore, no return sample analysis could be performed.However, customer had returned photographs and reported issue was unable to confirm based on the photographs had provided.The reported issue was unable to be confirmed.The root cause was identified as cause traced to user.Currently no adverse trend identified for discrepant result.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor for trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SEE H.10
Type of Device
SEE H.10
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
5859 farinon drive
san antonio, TX 78249
8448235433
MDR Report Key16599347
MDR Text Key312307722
Report Number1119779-2023-00325
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GNX
UDI-Device Identifier00382902560456
UDI-Public00382902560456
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
PMA/PMN Number
K132692
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number256045
Device Catalogue Number256045
Device Lot Number2269666
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2023
Initial Date FDA Received03/23/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/24/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/26/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-