• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH UNK - CONSTRUCTS: PLATE/SCREWS; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH UNK - CONSTRUCTS: PLATE/SCREWS; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Event Date 01/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthese is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthese has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthese or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthese, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.This report is for an unknown construct: plate/screws/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Initial reporter is a synthese employee.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article davis, b., shybut, t., coleman, m.And shah, a.(2021) risk factors for hardware removal following operative treatment of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures, journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, vol.30 (xx) pages e103¿e113 (usa) the aim of this retrospective study is (1) evaluate the incidence of postoperative hwr after plate fixation of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures, (2) identify risk factors for hwr, and (3) characterize indications for hwr surgery.Between year 2008 to 2018, a total of 103 patients, 87 patients underwent plate and screw fixation for a midshaft clavicular fracture, 16 patients underwent plate and screw fixation for a distal third clavicular fracture with a mean age of 37.8 years (range, 16-75 years), 79 patients were male patients.Implants used varied widely and appeared to vary over time.The most common mechanisms of injury were falls, motor vehicle collisions, and sports injuries.There were no open fractures.The anatomic plate location was superior in 75 patients and anteroinferior in 1 patient, whereas dual plating was used in 27 patients.The following complications were reported as follows: middle third clavicle fracture hardware removal: patient #2- a 21-year-old male experienced pain with straps (backpack) and with palpation due to football; depuy synthes distal clavicle plate and screws patient #3- a 56-year-old male had a bicycle accident; dual plating: depuy synthese 2.7-mm and 2.4-mm lcp patient #4- a 57-year-old female experienced plate prominence and local irritation and/or discomfort: hypersensitivity and periincisional numbness due to fall; depuy synthese 2.4-mm lcp patient #5- an 18-year-old male experienced local irritation and/or discomfort: pain over superior clavicle with range of motion due to snowboarding; dual plating: depuy synthes 2.4-mm and 2.4-mm lcp distal third clavicle fracture hardware removal: patient #6- a 39-year-old male had a plate prominence due to fall; depuy synthese locking plate retained patient #7- a 68-year-old male experienced plate prominence and local irritation and/or discomfort due to fall; depuy synthese distal clavicle plate and coracoid screw patient #8- a 55-year-old female had a coracoid screw failure and hardware prominence due to fall; coracoid screw (depuy synthese distal clavicle plate retained) patient #9- a 41-year-old female had a plate prominence and local irritation and/or discomfort due to fall; depuy synthese distal clavicle plate 12 patients who experienced complications after index procedure: n= 4 early hardware failure* n= 3 hypertrophic scar or keloid n= 2 minor wound dehiscence n= 2 other soft tissue* n= 1 refracture this report is for an unk - construct: plate/screws.A copy of the literature article is being submitted with this medwatch.This is report 6 of 11 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - CONSTRUCTS: PLATE/SCREWS
Type of Device
PLATE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 19380
3035526892
MDR Report Key16628733
MDR Text Key312151284
Report Number8030965-2023-03736
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-