The reported event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good-faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident-related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record.The review confirms there were no manufacturing or processing non-conformities identified that would contribute to the reported event/incident.The device was not returned to endologix for evaluation because it remains implanted.A clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident was completed.An examination of medical records and/or medical imaging received by endologix shows the type ia endoleak is unconfirmed.The infolding of the polymer ring is confirmed.This is moderately consistent with the reported adverse event/incident.If the polymer rings were placed high into the smaller diameter of the proximal neck, infolding could have occurred.With the imaging provided, however, that could not be conclusively determined.Procedure-related harms, device, user, procedure, or anatomy-relatedness of this complaint could not be determined with the medical records available for review.The final patient status was reported as being discharged.No additional investigation of this reported event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar events/incidents.Corrections: h6 investigation finding codes; remove 3233.H6 investigation conclusion codes; remove 11.
|