• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEONHARD LANG GMBH STABLE BASE; ECG ELECTRODE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEONHARD LANG GMBH STABLE BASE; ECG ELECTRODE Back to Search Results
Model Number W-601
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Itching Sensation (1943); Rash (2033)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On march 09th, 2023, we have been informed an incident with ecg electrodes.Monitoring ecg electrodes (model: sbw601) had been used.The initial report stated "i am trying to find out more information about the electrodes i was supplied with for a 30 day cardiac monitor.I have attached a picture with product information.Do these electrodes contain any latex? i had an allergic reaction and i would like to identify if it is latex (known allergen), adhesive, or something else.The company who provided me with the electrodes could not answer my question." attached to these initial report a photo was provided showing a pouch of stable base ecg electrode lot number: 220715-0153.On march 13rd, 2023 we have received additional information in a filled in questionaire.A monitoring of arrhythmia was performed.The patient skin was described as normal and the general state also as normal.The medical history was described as "psoriasis, eczema, multiple allergies including latex, asthama".5 ecg electrode per use have been placed in the chest / abdomen area.In total the patient used 35 electrodes in 23 days.The patient described that the procedure should last for 30 days but was "shortened due to skin irritation and no available skin to apply electrodes that was intact / no rash.23 days total".The skin spreperation was described as cleaned, not shaven, not disinfected but has been dried and the rash was treated with "vtama, hydrocortisone".The ecg electrode were adhering to the patient skin and residues haves "sometimes - cleaned gently with soap to remove adhesive" "during and after 30 day monitor" in the chest, abdomen area "redness, rash-raised, itching then scabbed areas" have been detected "underneath adhesive and gel areas around edge in middle".The size was described as "1-2 inch areas where electrodes touched skin".The skin injury was treated by topical medications.No further details have been disclosed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Retained samples of the concerned lot/batch of model: sbt601 have been inspected visually.Mechanical tests were performed on 3 retained samples.All tested samples were found to perform within limits.No faults could be detected.The product does not contain any latex, which was communicated to the user.It is conceivable that her preexisting skin issues have contributed or caused the incident.No further analysis can be performed.We therefore consider the investigation and the report closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STABLE BASE
Type of Device
ECG ELECTRODE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEONHARD LANG GMBH
archenweg 56
innsbruck, 6020
AU  6020
Manufacturer Contact
archenweg 56
innsbruck, 6020
MDR Report Key16680267
MDR Text Key312674153
Report Number8020045-2023-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRX
UDI-Device Identifier10861779000274
UDI-Public(01)10861779000274
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K023503
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberW-601
Device Catalogue NumberSBW601
Device Lot Number220715-0153
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/15/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight78 KG
-
-