Model Number MI1250 SYNCHRONY 2 |
Device Problems
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problems
Inflammation (1932); Skin Tears (2516)
|
Event Date 03/23/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was initially reported that the user an inflammation and therefore the electrode was removed to clean it and then it was re-inserted.This revision surgery took place on (b)(6) 2023.It was later reported that the device housing was not found properly situated at the revision surgery.The electrode array was found fully inserted in the cochlea.At the revision surgery a new and deeper implant bed was created, away from the original implant bed.Reportedly there was inflammation of the skin due to the original poor location of the implant housing.Per op report there had been an extrusion of the implant in the retro-auricular region.Granulation was removed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Conclusion: device investigation of the received parts did not reveal any device defect or problem which is expected to have been present whilst implanted.According to the information received from the field the recipient underwent a revision surgery due to an extrusion of the device through the skin.In addition during the revision surgery a dislocation of the implant housing from its intended position was observed.Furthermore, the implant area was found to be infected.During the revision surgery, the infection was cleaned and the device fixated properly.However, the observed infection re-occurred leading to explantation of the device.A review of the device_s sterilization records shows that the device has been subject to a valid sterilization process.No information available points to the implant being the source of the infection.This is a final report.
|
|
Event Description
|
Initial information was received that the user had a large inflammation and therefore at a revision surgery the electrode was removed to clean it and then it was re-inserted.This revision surgery took place on (b)(6) 2023.However, additional information gathered later indicated that there was an infection of the implant bed and dislocation of the device housing.The device housing was not found properly situated at the revision surgery.Per op report there had been an extrusion of the implant in the retro-auricular region and granulation tissue was removed.The electrode array was found fully inserted in the cochlea.No cultures were taken.At the revision surgery a new and deeper implant bed was created, away from the original implant bed.Reportedly there was inflammation of the skin due to the poor location of the implant housing.Two months after revision surgery, the user is bleeding behind the ear, the inflammation is back again.Thus, the user has been explanted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|