It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in the mid basilic vein arteriovenous fistula stenosis via distal basilic vein arteriovenous fistula, the pta balloon allegedly burst at 14 atm.It was further reported that the balloon was allegedly separated from the shaft.Furthermore, there was difficulty in retracting the balloon thru the introducer sheath as the balloon sheared off the catheter and the balloon did not come out.Reportedly, the patient was injured due to rupture and the balloon could not be retrieved which required deployment of two additional stents to exclude the foreign body.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in the mid basilic vein arteriovenous fistula stenosis via distal basilic vein arteriovenous fistula, the pta balloon allegedly burst at 14 atm.It was further reported that the balloon was allegedly separated from the shaft.Furthermore, there was difficulty in retracting the balloon through the introducer sheath as the balloon sheared off the catheter and the balloon did not come out.Reportedly, the patient was injured due to rupture and the balloon could not be retrieved which required deployment of two additional stents to exclude the foreign body.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one atlas gold pta dilatation catheter was returned for evaluation.The balloon was noted to be detached from the catheter, exposing the inner guide wire lumen.The detached balloon was not returned for evaluation.The glue bullet was not seated in the correct position.No other anomalies were noted with the returned device during the visual evaluation.No functional testing was performed due to the condition of the device.As the balloon was completely detached from the catheter and not returned for evaluation, no objective evidence for rupture or evidence of removal difficulty could be observed.Hence, the investigation can only be confirmed about the reported balloon detachment and the investigation remains inconclusive for the reported balloon rupture and difficulty to remove it.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture, balloon detachment and difficult to remove could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2026), g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd. .H3 other text : see h10.
|