Catalog Number 42055040-120 |
Device Problems
Premature Activation (1484); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/17/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately calcified, mildly tortuous, 75% stenosed lesion in the distal superficial femoral artery (dsfa).After device preparation, the 5.5x40mmx120cm supera peripheral self-expanding stent system (sess) was advanced with no noted resistance; however, the stent prematurely deployed in the anatomy before the stent deployment lock was opened.The system lock was brought back to its original position and the stent delivery system removed; however, it was noted that the nose cone separated and was inside the vessel.Removal of the separated nose cone was difficult, but was eventually removed with a snare device.There was no adverse patient sequela and no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure or therapy.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the initially filed report, the following information was received: the stent prematurely deployed in the target lesion before the stent deployment lock was opened.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported tip material separation was able to be confirmed.The reported premature activation was unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The reported difficult to remove was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.Additionally, it was noted that the inner member and tip jacket material had separations.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.A cine was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist.In conclusion: the media (video and image) does confirm that there is a malfunction in the device as the self expanding stent system (sess) tip of the catheter is separated in the image and visualized being removed with the snare in the video.We are unaware what pre-treatment devices were applied to the target complex lesion prior to the deployment of the supera sess.This is a concern since if the complex lesion was not pre-treated appropriately prior to the introduction of the sess, the characteristics of the lesion indicated in the report may or may not influence device performance.In addition, the report states that the device was prepared without an issue, we unfortunately cannot assume that this was done per ifu, as well as the device handled per the ifu prior to insertion into the body.There is no probable cause for the event.It is possible that prior to unlocking the deployment lock interactions with the moderately calcified, mildly tortuous and 75% stenosed anatomy and/or the delivery system was inadvertently pulled back slightly resulting in inadvertent full deployment of the stent; however, this could not be confirmed.The investigation determined a conclusive cause for the reported premature activation/deployment cannot be determined.During removal interaction with other devices and/or the moderately calcified, mildly tortuous and 75% stenosed anatomy likely resulted in the reported tip material separation and noted inner member and tip jacket material separations; thus resulting in the reported difficult to remove.The treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure as the separated nose cone was eventually removed with a snare device.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.Na.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|