For investigation laboratory tests were performed with the same filter type.No significant raise of resistance could be determined with deliberately caused condensate.The resistance requirement of =2mbar at a flow of 30l/min was fulfilled.Only a moist filter fleece showed increased resistance.However, this scenario do not reflect a realistic use case.The orientation of the filter has an impact on the formation of condensate.The horizontally mounted filter showed less condensate then the vertical mounted filter.Due to the limited information and no availability of log files or the filter itself, no root cause could be determined.An increased resistance or clogged filter is detected by the main device via pressure monitoring.An alarm is issued depending on the alarm limits set by the user.The alarm limits of the basic device must be set that they correspond to the therapy requirements.If the resistance is too high, the filter must be replaced immediately.The regional regulatory affairs & quality system administrator stated that "there is no relationship between the events you mention [cardio respiratory arrest] and the failures with our filters".Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that the caused or contributed to the reported injury.
|