H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, a revision surgery performed to replace an 18mm poly insert due to instability and ¿found broken¿ after an unknown length of time in-vivo.The current patient status is unknown.It was communicated that the requested medical documentation and further information were not available.Without the supporting clinical documentation, a definitive clinical root cause of the reported event cannot be concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported instability and insert revision due to breakage cannot be determined.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, instructions for use, risk management file and prior actions review could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|