• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) SEE H.10

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) SEE H.10 Back to Search Results
Model Number 256045
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/22/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
D1: medical device brand name: bd veritor¿ system for rapid detection of flu a+b clia-waved kit d2a: common device name: antigens, cf (including cf control), influenza virus a, b, c.H.3.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that bd veritor¿ system for rapid detection of flu a+b clia-waved kit customer read test for symptomatic patient per ifu and obtained a negative result.Because there was visual distinction customer read the test on a different analyzer and got a positive result.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer read the test at 10 min, per ifu, and got a neg result.Because there was a visually distinctive test line, customer read the test in 4 minutes on another veritor analyzer, and got the pos result.Patient was supposedly symptomatic.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary this statement is to summarize the investigation results regarding the complaint that alleges ¿false negative result¿ when using kit flu a+b 30 test physician veritor (material # 256045), batch number 2339140.Based on the provided information, it was understood that the customer suspects the result was false negative because there was a visually distinctive test line on the cartridge.According to them, they read the test at 10 min, per ifu, and got a negative result.At the 10-minute mark when it was time to read the test, a red positive line was very clear and evident on influenza a with the naked eye, however when placed into the reader, it said negative.Customer read the same test cartridge in 4 minutes on another veritor analyzer and got the positive result.Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate false negative result complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples, if applicable.Bhr (batch history review) analysis and retain sample testing were performed on the batch number provided and no issues were found, and results were acceptable.No physical samples were returned, therefore, return sample analysis could not be performed, however customer sent a photograph of test cartridge, which shown red line in the test window.The reported issue could not be determined based on the photograph, because this test is not designed to read visually, the results must be determined using the bd veritor instrument only.Customer had read the same cartridge second time in the different machine, which is not recommended by bd.The complaint was unable to be confirmed.A trend analysis for false negative was conducted, no adverse trend was identified.Bd quality will continue to monitor for trends.There were no corrective actions taken at this time.
 
Event Description
It was reported that bd veritor¿ system for rapid detection of flu a+b clia-waved kit customer read test for symptomatic patient per ifu and obtained a negative result.Because there was visual distinction customer read the test on a different analyzer and got a positive result.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer read the test at 10 min, per ifu, and got a neg result.Because there was a visually distinctive test line, customer read the test in 4 minutes on another veritor analyzer, and got the pos result.Patient was supposedly symptomatic.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SEE H.10
Type of Device
SEE H.10
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
5859 farinon drive
san antonio, TX 78249
8448235433
MDR Report Key16748914
MDR Text Key313522828
Report Number1119779-2023-00427
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GNX
UDI-Device Identifier00382902560456
UDI-Public00382902560456
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132692
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/16/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number256045
Device Catalogue Number256045
Device Lot Number2339140
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-