|
Device Problem
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); Respiratory Failure (2484)
|
Event Date 02/27/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device not returned to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer received a voluntary medwatch (mw5115793) from an end user¿s caretaker (mother) alleging her son¿s first bipap machine broke in 2022 and he was, therefore, without a replacement device for two months.The replacement machine was received around january 15, 2023.The caretaker alleges that after using the replacement bipap device, her son became very sick and was admitted to the hospital (intensive care unit) for pulmonary failure and a systemic infection (teeth, skin, stomach, and blood).The caretaker alleges her son was treated with antibiotics and steroids and was released after one week in the hospital.The caretaker alleges that when the dme tried to download her son¿s sleep data (from the card), it still had the name of the previous user which prevented her son¿s information from being recorded.The caretaker believes her son became sick due to the reconditioned machine not being properly cleaned/disinfected from the previous owner.The caretaker reported her son is using a bipap machine from another company and is doing better.The device has not yet been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer previously reported after receiving a voluntary medwatch (mw5115793) from an end user¿s caretaker (mother) alleging her son¿s first bipap machine broke in 2022 and he was, therefore, without a replacement device for two months.The replacement machine was received around january 15, 2023.The caretaker alleges that after using the replacement bipap device, her son became very sick and was admitted to the hospital (intensive care unit) for pulmonary failure and a systemic infection (teeth, skin, stomach, and blood).The caretaker alleges her son was treated with antibiotics and steroids and was released after one week in the hospital.The caretaker alleges that when the dme tried to download her son¿s sleep data (from the card), it still had the name of the previous user which prevented her son¿s information from being recorded.The caretaker believes her son became sick due to the reconditioned machine not being properly cleaned/disinfected from the previous owner.The caretaker reported her son is using a bipap machine from another company and is doing better.The device has not yet been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Three attempts to have the device returned for evaluation and investigation were unsuccessful.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|