Model Number SONNET 2 CONTROL UNIT EAS [OPUS 4 CPU EAS] |
Device Problems
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
|
Patient Problem
Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Date 04/10/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
The user was implanted on (b)(6) 2022 on the left ear, and was activated and was using her external device without any problem until the surgery of the contra lateral right ear on (b)(6) 2023.After this surgery, the child did not want to wear the external device anymore and complained about pain when using it, throwing it away every time the parents wanted to put it on her left ear.Per new information received, the user was given a new processor to try at home.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: according to the information received from the field the recipient experienced painful sensations with the use of the audioprocessor.Reportedly no further issues are reported with a new audioprocessor.However to determined an exact root cause a device investigation would be necessary.The concerned device has not been received for investigation yet.Please note: the initial report was submitted for the implant, mi1250 synchrony 2 flex26 sn (b)(6).However, since the issue was due to the audioprocessor, the product type was changed.This event can lead to the inconvenience of requiring the external device to be exchanged through regular service activities, but no detrimental impact on user_s safety is observed or expected.Therefore this case is per se no longer deemed reportable,.
|
|
Event Description
|
The user was implanted on (b)(6)2022 on the left ear, and was activated and was using her external device without any problem until the surgery of the contra lateral right ear on 08-mar-2023.After this surgery, the child did not want to wear the external device anymore and complained about pain when using it, throwing it away every time the parents wanted to put it on her left ear.Only bipolar cautery was used at implantation of the contra-lateral device.Mapping can be ruled out as an issue since the user does not even tolerate stimulation levels lower than those of activation.The user was given a new ap to try at home.As of (b)(6)2023 it was reported that the user is using the loaner ap without any issue still.The ap which caused the reported symptoms will be returned once a new ap for the user arrives.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|